DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Ge, Fiona | ko |
dc.contributor.author | Park, Jiyoung | ko |
dc.contributor.author | Pietromonaco, Paula R. | ko |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-06-21T01:00:20Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2023-06-21T01:00:20Z | - |
dc.date.created | 2023-06-21 | - |
dc.date.created | 2023-06-21 | - |
dc.date.issued | 2022-07 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | JOURNAL OF CROSS-CULTURAL PSYCHOLOGY, v.53, no.6, pp.583 - 602 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0022-0221 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10203/307345 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Communication plays an integral role in shaping romantic relationship quality. Yet, little is known about whether people from different cultural backgrounds communicate differently in their romantic relationships. Here, we addressed this issue by examining (a) whether the extent to which individuals communicate directly or indirectly in their romantic relationships varies by culture, (b) what mechanism underlies these cultural differences, and (c) how the fit between culture and communication style contributes to expected relationship satisfaction. Three key findings emerged across three studies (total N = 1,193). First, Chinese preferred indirect (vs. direct) communication more than European Americans, and this effect was more strongly pronounced in positively (vs. negatively) valenced situations (Studies 1-3). Second, interdependent (vs. independent) self-construal mediated the cultural difference in indirect communication both in positive and negative situations (Study 3). Finally, both cultural groups anticipated greater relationship satisfaction when they imagined their partner using the culturally preferred mode of communication-that is, indirect communication for Chinese and direct communication for European Americans (Study 3). These findings advance theory on culture and romantic relationship processes by demonstrating cultural differences in preferred communication styles across different situational contexts, identifying self-construal differences underlying these preferred communication styles, and highlighting the importance of congruence between culture and communication style for the quality of relationships. | - |
dc.language | English | - |
dc.publisher | SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC | - |
dc.title | How You Talk About It Matters: Cultural Variation in Communication Directness in Romantic Relationships | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.identifier.wosid | 000777957700001 | - |
dc.identifier.scopusid | 2-s2.0-85127767389 | - |
dc.type.rims | ART | - |
dc.citation.volume | 53 | - |
dc.citation.issue | 6 | - |
dc.citation.beginningpage | 583 | - |
dc.citation.endingpage | 602 | - |
dc.citation.publicationname | JOURNAL OF CROSS-CULTURAL PSYCHOLOGY | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1177/00220221221088934 | - |
dc.contributor.localauthor | Park, Jiyoung | - |
dc.contributor.nonIdAuthor | Ge, Fiona | - |
dc.contributor.nonIdAuthor | Pietromonaco, Paula R. | - |
dc.description.isOpenAccess | N | - |
dc.type.journalArticle | Article | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | culture | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | communication directness | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | interdependence versus independence | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | romantic relationships | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | relationship quality | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | CLOSE RELATIONSHIPS | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | IMPLICIT INDEPENDENCE | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | SELF-DISCLOSURE | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | UNITED-STATES | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | EMOTIONS | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | SUPPRESSION | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | EXPRESSION | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | ADJUSTMENT | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | CONFLICT | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | PARTNERS | - |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.