How You Talk About It Matters: Cultural Variation in Communication Directness in Romantic Relationships

Cited 6 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
  • Hit : 147
  • Download : 0
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGe, Fionako
dc.contributor.authorPark, Jiyoungko
dc.contributor.authorPietromonaco, Paula R.ko
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-21T01:00:20Z-
dc.date.available2023-06-21T01:00:20Z-
dc.date.created2023-06-21-
dc.date.created2023-06-21-
dc.date.issued2022-07-
dc.identifier.citationJOURNAL OF CROSS-CULTURAL PSYCHOLOGY, v.53, no.6, pp.583 - 602-
dc.identifier.issn0022-0221-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10203/307345-
dc.description.abstractCommunication plays an integral role in shaping romantic relationship quality. Yet, little is known about whether people from different cultural backgrounds communicate differently in their romantic relationships. Here, we addressed this issue by examining (a) whether the extent to which individuals communicate directly or indirectly in their romantic relationships varies by culture, (b) what mechanism underlies these cultural differences, and (c) how the fit between culture and communication style contributes to expected relationship satisfaction. Three key findings emerged across three studies (total N = 1,193). First, Chinese preferred indirect (vs. direct) communication more than European Americans, and this effect was more strongly pronounced in positively (vs. negatively) valenced situations (Studies 1-3). Second, interdependent (vs. independent) self-construal mediated the cultural difference in indirect communication both in positive and negative situations (Study 3). Finally, both cultural groups anticipated greater relationship satisfaction when they imagined their partner using the culturally preferred mode of communication-that is, indirect communication for Chinese and direct communication for European Americans (Study 3). These findings advance theory on culture and romantic relationship processes by demonstrating cultural differences in preferred communication styles across different situational contexts, identifying self-construal differences underlying these preferred communication styles, and highlighting the importance of congruence between culture and communication style for the quality of relationships.-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.publisherSAGE PUBLICATIONS INC-
dc.titleHow You Talk About It Matters: Cultural Variation in Communication Directness in Romantic Relationships-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.wosid000777957700001-
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85127767389-
dc.type.rimsART-
dc.citation.volume53-
dc.citation.issue6-
dc.citation.beginningpage583-
dc.citation.endingpage602-
dc.citation.publicationnameJOURNAL OF CROSS-CULTURAL PSYCHOLOGY-
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/00220221221088934-
dc.contributor.localauthorPark, Jiyoung-
dc.contributor.nonIdAuthorGe, Fiona-
dc.contributor.nonIdAuthorPietromonaco, Paula R.-
dc.description.isOpenAccessN-
dc.type.journalArticleArticle-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorculture-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorcommunication directness-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorinterdependence versus independence-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorromantic relationships-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorrelationship quality-
dc.subject.keywordPlusCLOSE RELATIONSHIPS-
dc.subject.keywordPlusIMPLICIT INDEPENDENCE-
dc.subject.keywordPlusSELF-DISCLOSURE-
dc.subject.keywordPlusUNITED-STATES-
dc.subject.keywordPlusEMOTIONS-
dc.subject.keywordPlusSUPPRESSION-
dc.subject.keywordPlusEXPRESSION-
dc.subject.keywordPlusADJUSTMENT-
dc.subject.keywordPlusCONFLICT-
dc.subject.keywordPlusPARTNERS-
Appears in Collection
HSS-Journal Papers(저널논문)
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
This item is cited by other documents in WoS
⊙ Detail Information in WoSⓡ Click to see webofscience_button
⊙ Cited 6 items in WoS Click to see citing articles in records_button

qr_code

  • mendeley

    citeulike


rss_1.0 rss_2.0 atom_1.0