DETERMINATION OF DESIGN ALTERNATIVES AND PERFORMANCE CRITERIA FOR SAFETY SYSTEMS IN A NUCLEAR-POWER-PLANT VIA SIMULATED ANNEALING

Abstract

This study presents an efficient methodology that derives design alternatives and performance criteria for safety functions/systems in commercial nuclear power plants. Determination of the design alternatives and intermediate-level performance criteria is posed as a reliability allocation problem. The reliability allocation is performed in a single step by means of the concept of two-tier noninferior solutions in the objective and risk spaces within the top-level probabilistic safety criteria (PSC). Two kinds of two-tier noninferior solutions are obtained: desirable design alternatives and intolerable intermediate-level PSC of safety functions/systems. The weighted Chebyshev norm (WCN) approach with an improved Metropolis algorithm in simulated annealing is used to find the two-tier noninferior solutions. This is very efficient in searching for the global minimum of the difficult multiobjective optimization problem (MOP) which results from strong nonlinearity of a probabilistic safety assessment (PSA) model and nonconvexity of the problem. The methodology developed in this study can be used as an efficient design tool for desirable safety function/system alternatives and for the determination of intermediate-level performance criteria. The methodology is applied to a realistic streamlined PSA model that is developed based on the PSA results of the Surry Unit 1 nuclear power plant. The methodology developed in this study is very efficient in providing the intolerable intermediate-level PSC and desirable design alternatives of safety functions/systems.