Product Recalls and Audit Production

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
  • Hit : 8
  • Download : 0
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKim, Kevin H.ko
dc.contributor.authorNash, Jonathanko
dc.contributor.authorPark, Jonghanko
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-05T10:00:15Z-
dc.date.available2024-09-05T10:00:15Z-
dc.date.created2022-11-01-
dc.date.issued2024-05-
dc.identifier.citationEUROPEAN ACCOUNTING REVIEW, v.33, no.3, pp.901 - 928-
dc.identifier.issn0963-8180-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10203/322705-
dc.description.abstractWe examine the impact of product recalls on audit production. Product recalls are events that increase engagement risk associated with greater audit effort, and by extension, greater audit quality. Consistent with this conclusion, we find firm-years with a product recall have a lower likelihood of being subsequently restated and lower levels of accrual error. While a positive association generally exists between audit effort and audit fees, prior literature shows firms experiencing economic stress negotiate lower audit fees and auditors accept lower fees to earn future returns. We expect that to increase the likelihood of retaining a client, auditors will agree to lower fees when the short-term economic stress associated with a recall injects downward pressure into fee negotiations. Supporting this conclusion, we find product recalls are associated with lower audit fees - a relation attributable to differing magnitudes of temporal fee increase. We also show the effects are transitory, the higher levels of audit quality are attributable to specialist audit offices, and the lower levels of fees are attributable to engagements where the client has greater bargaining power. While a positive association typically exists between audit effort and audit fees, our paper identifies a firm-specific event that weakens this relation.-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.publisherROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD-
dc.titleProduct Recalls and Audit Production-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.wosid000870634400001-
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85140928063-
dc.type.rimsART-
dc.citation.volume33-
dc.citation.issue3-
dc.citation.beginningpage901-
dc.citation.endingpage928-
dc.citation.publicationnameEUROPEAN ACCOUNTING REVIEW-
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/09638180.2022.2130953-
dc.contributor.localauthorKim, Kevin H.-
dc.contributor.nonIdAuthorNash, Jonathan-
dc.contributor.nonIdAuthorPark, Jonghan-
dc.description.isOpenAccessN-
dc.type.journalArticleArticle-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorDiscretionary Accruals-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorAudit fees-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorProduct recall-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorRestatements-
dc.subject.keywordPlusENTERPRISE RISK-MANAGEMENT-
dc.subject.keywordPlusBUSINESS RISK-
dc.subject.keywordPlusINDUSTRY SPECIALIZATION-
dc.subject.keywordPlusQUALITY-
dc.subject.keywordPlusFEES-
dc.subject.keywordPlusEARNINGS-
dc.subject.keywordPlusREPUTATION-
dc.subject.keywordPlusIMPACT-
dc.subject.keywordPlusENGAGEMENTS-
dc.subject.keywordPlusDETERMINANTS-
Appears in Collection
MG-Journal Papers(저널논문)
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.

qr_code

  • mendeley

    citeulike


rss_1.0 rss_2.0 atom_1.0