From microelectromechanical switches to nanoelectromechanical switches: Lessons and differences

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
  • Hit : 36
  • Download : 0
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorYoon, Jun-Boko
dc.date.accessioned2023-11-16T02:04:54Z-
dc.date.available2023-11-16T02:04:54Z-
dc.date.created2023-11-16-
dc.date.issued2015-10-
dc.identifier.citation4th Berkeley Symposium on Energy Efficient Electronic Systems, E3S 2015-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10203/314768-
dc.description.abstractSince a microelectromechanical (MEM) switch with an electrostatically actuated cantilever was first demonstrated by Petersen in 1978 [1], MEM switches and nanoelectromechanical (NEM) switches have actively been researched so far by many research groups. This is because they are considered as one of the ideal switching devices, thanks to their ideal zero leakage characteristic, nearly infinite sub-threshold slope, large On/Off current ratio, low power consumption, and immunity to harsh environments. Now, we are dreaming of a NEM IC in the future (Fig. 1).-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.publisherInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.-
dc.titleFrom microelectromechanical switches to nanoelectromechanical switches: Lessons and differences-
dc.typeConference-
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-84962110228-
dc.type.rimsCONF-
dc.citation.publicationname4th Berkeley Symposium on Energy Efficient Electronic Systems, E3S 2015-
dc.identifier.conferencecountryUS-
dc.identifier.conferencelocationBerkeley-
dc.identifier.doi10.1109/E3S.2015.7336787-
dc.contributor.localauthorYoon, Jun-Bo-
Appears in Collection
EE-Conference Papers(학술회의논문)
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.

qr_code

  • mendeley

    citeulike


rss_1.0 rss_2.0 atom_1.0