DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Yoon, Jun-Bo | ko |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-11-16T02:04:54Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2023-11-16T02:04:54Z | - |
dc.date.created | 2023-11-16 | - |
dc.date.issued | 2015-10 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | 4th Berkeley Symposium on Energy Efficient Electronic Systems, E3S 2015 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10203/314768 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Since a microelectromechanical (MEM) switch with an electrostatically actuated cantilever was first demonstrated by Petersen in 1978 [1], MEM switches and nanoelectromechanical (NEM) switches have actively been researched so far by many research groups. This is because they are considered as one of the ideal switching devices, thanks to their ideal zero leakage characteristic, nearly infinite sub-threshold slope, large On/Off current ratio, low power consumption, and immunity to harsh environments. Now, we are dreaming of a NEM IC in the future (Fig. 1). | - |
dc.language | English | - |
dc.publisher | Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc. | - |
dc.title | From microelectromechanical switches to nanoelectromechanical switches: Lessons and differences | - |
dc.type | Conference | - |
dc.identifier.scopusid | 2-s2.0-84962110228 | - |
dc.type.rims | CONF | - |
dc.citation.publicationname | 4th Berkeley Symposium on Energy Efficient Electronic Systems, E3S 2015 | - |
dc.identifier.conferencecountry | US | - |
dc.identifier.conferencelocation | Berkeley | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1109/E3S.2015.7336787 | - |
dc.contributor.localauthor | Yoon, Jun-Bo | - |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.