Ask for Reviews at The Right Time: Evidence from Two Field Experiments

Cited 1 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
  • Hit : 223
  • Download : 0
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorJung, Miyeonko
dc.contributor.authorRyu, Sunghanko
dc.contributor.authorHan, Sang Pilko
dc.contributor.authorCho, Daegonko
dc.date.accessioned2023-07-05T01:00:08Z-
dc.date.available2023-07-05T01:00:08Z-
dc.date.created2022-11-22-
dc.date.issued2023-07-
dc.identifier.citationJOURNAL OF MARKETING, v.87, no.4, pp.528 - 549-
dc.identifier.issn0022-2429-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10203/310295-
dc.description.abstractThis study examines how the timing of review reminders affects the likelihood and quality of product review postings. The authors postulate that review reminders have two distinct effects, depending on the delivery timing. On the one hand, reminders of review posting given immediately or shortly after a product experience may threaten a consumer's freedom and prompt an adverse reaction. On the other hand, as time after the product experience passes, it may be advantageous to revive memories of review posting using delayed review reminders. To evaluate the effect of review reminders, they conducted two randomized field experiments. The findings show that immediate reminders reduce the chance of review postings relative to a randomized immediate control group who did not receive a reminder, consistent with the notion that the reactance induced by the violation of freedom due to instant review reminders outweighs the benefit of memory recall. Conversely, delayed reminders significantly increase the likelihood of review posting compared to a randomized delayed control, suggesting that the memory recall benefit surpasses reactance. However, the timing of review reminders has little effect on review content. The study contributes to the literature on the temporal effects of marketing activities and provides practical advice for online marketplaces to collect more product reviews.-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.publisherSAGE PUBLICATIONS INC-
dc.titleAsk for Reviews at The Right Time: Evidence from Two Field Experiments-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.wosid000949354000001-
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85150930692-
dc.type.rimsART-
dc.citation.volume87-
dc.citation.issue4-
dc.citation.beginningpage528-
dc.citation.endingpage549-
dc.citation.publicationnameJOURNAL OF MARKETING-
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/00222429221143329-
dc.contributor.localauthorCho, Daegon-
dc.contributor.nonIdAuthorJung, Miyeon-
dc.contributor.nonIdAuthorRyu, Sunghan-
dc.contributor.nonIdAuthorHan, Sang Pil-
dc.description.isOpenAccessN-
dc.type.journalArticleArticle-
dc.subject.keywordAuthoronline reviews-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorreview reminder timing-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorpsychological reactance-
dc.subject.keywordAuthormemory recall-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorrandomized field experiment-
dc.subject.keywordPlusPSYCHOLOGICAL REACTANCE-
dc.subject.keywordPlusPROSPECTIVE MEMORY-
dc.subject.keywordPlusSAMPLE SELECTION-
dc.subject.keywordPlusONLINE COMMUNITIES-
dc.subject.keywordPlusRELIABILITY-
dc.subject.keywordPlusINTENTIONS-
dc.subject.keywordPlusREMINDERS-
dc.subject.keywordPlusBEHAVIOR-
dc.subject.keywordPlusPRODUCT-
dc.subject.keywordPlusAGE-
Appears in Collection
MT-Journal Papers(저널논문)
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
This item is cited by other documents in WoS
⊙ Detail Information in WoSⓡ Click to see webofscience_button
⊙ Cited 1 items in WoS Click to see citing articles in records_button

qr_code

  • mendeley

    citeulike


rss_1.0 rss_2.0 atom_1.0