Crosstalk-included PAM-4 Worst Eye Diagram Estimation Method for High-speed Serial Links

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
  • Hit : 188
  • Download : 0
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPark, Hyunwookko
dc.contributor.authorKim, Jounghoko
dc.contributor.authorKim, Keunwooko
dc.contributor.authorSim, BooGyoko
dc.contributor.authorLho, Daehwanko
dc.contributor.authorShin, TaeInko
dc.contributor.authorSon, Keeyoungko
dc.contributor.authorSong, Jinwookko
dc.date.accessioned2023-02-02T08:00:47Z-
dc.date.available2023-02-02T08:00:47Z-
dc.date.created2023-01-25-
dc.date.issued2021-10-17-
dc.identifier.citation30th IEEE Conference on Electrical Performance of Electronic Packaging and Systems, EPEPS 2021-
dc.identifier.issn2165-4107-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10203/304975-
dc.description.abstractIn this paper, we first propose a crosstalk-included pulse amplitude modulation-4 (PAM-4) worst eye diagram estimation method. The proposed method is based on the conventional peak distortion analysis (PDA) method. Compared to the non-return-to-zero (NRZ), the PAM-4 has 3 single bit responses (SBRs) due to the 4-level amplitude modulation. To consider worst crosstalk effects, the main idea is to take 3-level transition crosstalk responses as input when estimating each level-transition worst eyes by the PDA. By superposition of the estimated 1-level, 2-level and 3-level worst eyes, a PAM-4 worst eye contour can be provided as an innermost contour. For verification, we compared the estimated PAM-4 worst eye diagrams with those at bit-error-ratio (BER) 10-12 by the statistical eye simulator using input output buffer information specification-algorithmic modeling interface (IBIS-AMI). We compared the results in various cases: with 1 near-end crosstalk (NEXT) aggressor (aggr); with 1 NEXT and 1 far-end crosstalk (FEXT) aggrs; with 2 NEXT and 1 FEXT aggrs. The error rates of eye widths and heights between the proposed method and the simulator were 6.3 % and 4 % respectively. Moreover, we compared the computing time. The computing time of the proposed method was within 50 ms in all the cases, however that of the simulator increases from 10.5 s to 21.7 s as the number of aggrs increases.-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.publisherIEEE-
dc.titleCrosstalk-included PAM-4 Worst Eye Diagram Estimation Method for High-speed Serial Links-
dc.typeConference-
dc.identifier.wosid000758515900002-
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85123181377-
dc.type.rimsCONF-
dc.citation.publicationname30th IEEE Conference on Electrical Performance of Electronic Packaging and Systems, EPEPS 2021-
dc.identifier.conferencecountryUS-
dc.identifier.conferencelocationAustin-
dc.identifier.doi10.1109/EPEPS51341.2021.9609114-
dc.contributor.localauthorKim, Joungho-
Appears in Collection
EE-Conference Papers(학술회의논문)
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.

qr_code

  • mendeley

    citeulike


rss_1.0 rss_2.0 atom_1.0