A critical juncture in universal healthcare: insights from South Korea's COVID-19 experience for the United Kingdom to consider

Cited 8 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
  • Hit : 561
  • Download : 0
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHeo, Kyungmooko
dc.contributor.authorJeong, Keonyeongko
dc.contributor.authorLee, Dae Joongko
dc.contributor.authorSeo, Yongseokko
dc.date.accessioned2021-04-05T02:30:24Z-
dc.date.available2021-04-05T02:30:24Z-
dc.date.created2021-04-05-
dc.date.created2021-04-05-
dc.date.created2021-04-05-
dc.date.created2021-04-05-
dc.date.created2021-04-05-
dc.date.created2021-04-05-
dc.date.created2021-04-05-
dc.date.issued2021-03-
dc.identifier.citationHumanities & Social Sciences Communications, v.8, no.1-
dc.identifier.issn2662-9992-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10203/282280-
dc.description.abstractUniversal healthcare systems have undergone a severe stress test in the form of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. With respect to the system-embedded allocation of decision-making powers and responsibilities among actors, different modalities have been revealed in the COVID-19 responses of South Korea and the UK, respectively. This article compares and analyzes how these two countries' healthcare systems have reacted to COVID-19. Although both have implemented similar responsive measures, the UK has recorded a higher number of confirmed cases per thousand people and a higher death rate. Based on the analysis on which this paper is built, the key differences between the two systems are the UK system's lack of: (1) appropriate medical equipment and technologies along with the human resources; and (2) flexible policy options to incentivize healthcare providers and induce cooperation from the public in a time of national crisis. The UK's healthcare system is now approaching a critical juncture. The expansion of internal competition, which was introduced to the system in 1991, can serve as means of initiating a resolution to the above-mentioned issues and further reform its system. Under the UK government's close supervision and precise control, allowing non-reimbursable special medical treatment in the system and widening public choice of medical services would be a suitable policy approach promoting internal competition while at the same time maintaining the UK's devotion to universal healthcare. The underlying implication of internal competition though is the sharing of decision-making powers and responsibilities with societal and private sectors by inducing and facilitating participation at all levels. Fighting against COVID-19 however is widely considered 'all-out-war.' Under the UK government's supervision and control, it is time for society to step up and fight the pandemic together.-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.publisherPALGRAVE MACMILLAN LTD-
dc.titleA critical juncture in universal healthcare: insights from South Korea's COVID-19 experience for the United Kingdom to consider-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.wosid000625415300001-
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85101906799-
dc.type.rimsART-
dc.citation.volume8-
dc.citation.issue1-
dc.citation.publicationnameHumanities & Social Sciences Communications-
dc.identifier.doi10.1057/s41599-021-00731-y-
dc.contributor.localauthorHeo, Kyungmoo-
dc.contributor.localauthorSeo, Yongseok-
dc.description.isOpenAccessY-
dc.type.journalArticleArticle-
dc.subject.keywordPlusGREY LITERATURE-
dc.subject.keywordPlusCOMPETITION-
dc.subject.keywordPlusSTRATEGIES-
dc.subject.keywordPlusCHILDREN-
dc.subject.keywordPlusQUALITY-
dc.subject.keywordPlusIMPROVE-
Appears in Collection
RIMS Journal Papers
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
This item is cited by other documents in WoS
⊙ Detail Information in WoSⓡ Click to see webofscience_button
⊙ Cited 8 items in WoS Click to see citing articles in records_button

qr_code

  • mendeley

    citeulike


rss_1.0 rss_2.0 atom_1.0