Massive MIMO Channel Prediction: Kalman Filtering Vs. Machine Learning

Cited 45 time in webofscience Cited 27 time in scopus
  • Hit : 264
  • Download : 0
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKim, Hwanjinko
dc.contributor.authorKim, Sucheolko
dc.contributor.authorLee, Hyeongtaekko
dc.contributor.authorJang, Chulheeko
dc.contributor.authorChoi, Yongyunko
dc.contributor.authorChoi, Junilko
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-02T01:10:17Z-
dc.date.available2021-03-02T01:10:17Z-
dc.date.created2021-02-18-
dc.date.created2021-02-18-
dc.date.created2021-02-18-
dc.date.issued2021-01-
dc.identifier.citationIEEE TRANSACTIONS ON COMMUNICATIONS, v.69, no.1, pp.518 - 528-
dc.identifier.issn0090-6778-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10203/281084-
dc.description.abstractThis paper focuses on channel prediction techniques for massive multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) systems. Previous channel predictors are based on theoretical channel models, which would be deviated from realistic channels. In this paper, we develop and compare a vector Kalman filter (VKF)-based channel predictor and a machine learning (ML)-based channel predictor using the realistic channels from the spatial channel model (SCM), which has been adopted in the 3GPP standard for years. First, we propose a low-complexity mobility estimator based on the spatial average using a large number of antennas in massive MIMO. The mobility estimate can be used to determine the complexity order of developed predictors. The VKF-based channel predictor developed in this paper exploits the autoregressive (AR) parameters estimated from the SCM channels based on the Yule-Walker equations. Then, the ML-based channel predictor using the linear minimum mean square error (LMMSE)-based noise pre-processed data is developed. Numerical results reveal that both channel predictors have substantial gain over the outdated channel in terms of the channel prediction accuracy and data rate. The ML-based predictor has larger overall computational complexity than the VKF-based predictor, but once trained, the operational complexity of ML-based predictor becomes smaller than that of VKF-based predictor.-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.publisherIEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC-
dc.titleMassive MIMO Channel Prediction: Kalman Filtering Vs. Machine Learning-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.wosid000608689300035-
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85099748144-
dc.type.rimsART-
dc.citation.volume69-
dc.citation.issue1-
dc.citation.beginningpage518-
dc.citation.endingpage528-
dc.citation.publicationnameIEEE TRANSACTIONS ON COMMUNICATIONS-
dc.identifier.doi10.1109/TCOMM.2020.3027882-
dc.contributor.localauthorChoi, Junil-
dc.contributor.nonIdAuthorJang, Chulhee-
dc.contributor.nonIdAuthorChoi, Yongyun-
dc.description.isOpenAccessN-
dc.type.journalArticleArticle-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorMassive MIMO-
dc.subject.keywordAuthormobility estimation-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorchannel prediction-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorautoregressive model-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorvector Kalman filter-
dc.subject.keywordAuthormachine learning-
Appears in Collection
EE-Journal Papers(저널논문)
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
This item is cited by other documents in WoS
⊙ Detail Information in WoSⓡ Click to see webofscience_button
⊙ Cited 45 items in WoS Click to see citing articles in records_button

qr_code

  • mendeley

    citeulike


rss_1.0 rss_2.0 atom_1.0