Experimental validation of FE model updating based on multi-objective optimization using the surrogate model

Cited 8 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
  • Hit : 1289
  • Download : 0
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHwang, Yongmoonko
dc.contributor.authorJin, Seung-Seopko
dc.contributor.authorJung, Ho Yeonko
dc.contributor.authorKim, Sehoonko
dc.contributor.authorLee, Jong-Jaeko
dc.contributor.authorJung, Hyung-Joko
dc.date.accessioned2018-05-23T06:31:32Z-
dc.date.available2018-05-23T06:31:32Z-
dc.date.created2018-04-23-
dc.date.created2018-04-23-
dc.date.created2018-04-23-
dc.date.issued2018-01-
dc.identifier.citationSTRUCTURAL ENGINEERING AND MECHANICS, v.65, no.2, pp.173 - 181-
dc.identifier.issn1225-4568-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10203/241547-
dc.description.abstractIn this paper, finite element (FE) model updating based on multi-objective optimization with the surrogate model for a steel plate girder bridge is investigated. Conventionally, FE model updating for bridge structures uses single-objective optimization with finite element analysis (FEA). In the case of the conventional method, computational burden occurs considerably because a lot of iteration are performed during the updating process. This issue can be addressed by replacing FEA with the surrogate model. The other problem is that the updating result from single-objective optimization depends on the condition of the weighting factors. Previous studies have used the trial-and-error strategy, genetic algorithm, or user's preference to obtain the most preferred model; but it needs considerable computation cost. In this study, the FE model updating method consisting of the surrogate model and multi-objective optimization, which can construct the Pareto-optimal front through a single run without considering the weighting factors, is proposed to overcome the limitations of the single-objective optimization. To verify the proposed method, the results of the proposed method are compared with those of the single-objective optimization. The comparison shows that the updated model from the multi-objective optimization is superior to the result of single-objective optimization in calculation time as well as the relative errors between the updated model and measurement.-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.publisherTECHNO-PRESS-
dc.titleExperimental validation of FE model updating based on multi-objective optimization using the surrogate model-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.wosid000429344500005-
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85049205614-
dc.type.rimsART-
dc.citation.volume65-
dc.citation.issue2-
dc.citation.beginningpage173-
dc.citation.endingpage181-
dc.citation.publicationnameSTRUCTURAL ENGINEERING AND MECHANICS-
dc.identifier.doi10.12989/sem.2018.65.2.173-
dc.contributor.localauthorJung, Hyung-Jo-
dc.contributor.nonIdAuthorKim, Sehoon-
dc.contributor.nonIdAuthorLee, Jong-Jae-
dc.description.isOpenAccessN-
dc.type.journalArticleArticle-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorFE model updating-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorsurrogate model-
dc.subject.keywordAuthormulti-objective optimization-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorpareto-optimal front-
dc.subject.keywordPlusSTRUCTURAL IDENTIFICATION-
dc.subject.keywordPlusGENETIC ALGORITHM-
dc.subject.keywordPlusELEMENT-
dc.subject.keywordPlusUNCERTAINTY-
Appears in Collection
CE-Journal Papers(저널논문)
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
This item is cited by other documents in WoS
⊙ Detail Information in WoSⓡ Click to see webofscience_button
⊙ Cited 8 items in WoS Click to see citing articles in records_button

qr_code

  • mendeley

    citeulike


rss_1.0 rss_2.0 atom_1.0