Technological regimes and firm survival

Cited 25 time in webofscience Cited 20 time in scopus
  • Hit : 793
  • Download : 0
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKim, Junghoko
dc.contributor.authorLee, Chang-Yangko
dc.date.accessioned2016-06-07T09:18:34Z-
dc.date.available2016-06-07T09:18:34Z-
dc.date.created2016-01-25-
dc.date.created2016-01-25-
dc.date.issued2016-02-
dc.identifier.citationRESEARCH POLICY, v.45, no.1, pp.232 - 243-
dc.identifier.issn0048-7333-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10203/207879-
dc.description.abstractThis paper investigates whether the type of technological regime moderates the effects of entry timing, entry size (i.e., initial resources), and active (post-entry) learning on firm survival. By analyzing a unique dataset of newly founded Korean manufacturing firms, we find that the effects of the factors influencing firm survival differ substantially across technological regimes. Specifically, entry size has the greatest positive effect on firm survival under the regime characterized by low technological opportunity and high R&D appropriability, under which opportunities for disruptive innovation are stagnant and the advantages of initial resources are more likely to persist. Post-entry active learning through R&D, on the contrary, has the greatest effect on firm survival under the regime of high technological opportunity and low R&D appropriability, under which active learning through contemporaneous R&D effort is more crucial for firm survival than initial resource advantages mostly due to the possibility of creative destruction.-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.publisherELSEVIER SCIENCE BV-
dc.subjectRESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT-
dc.subjectRESOURCE-BASED VIEW-
dc.subjectMARKET-STRUCTURE-
dc.subjectSCHUMPETERIAN PATTERNS-
dc.subjectCOMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE-
dc.subjectDYNAMIC CAPABILITIES-
dc.subject1ST-MOVER ADVANTAGES-
dc.subjectPRODUCTIVITY GROWTH-
dc.subjectDOMINANT DESIGNS-
dc.subjectLIFE-CYCLE-
dc.titleTechnological regimes and firm survival-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.wosid000367484100018-
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-84961621645-
dc.type.rimsART-
dc.citation.volume45-
dc.citation.issue1-
dc.citation.beginningpage232-
dc.citation.endingpage243-
dc.citation.publicationnameRESEARCH POLICY-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.respol.2015.09.006-
dc.contributor.localauthorLee, Chang-Yang-
dc.contributor.nonIdAuthorKim, Jungho-
dc.type.journalArticleArticle-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorFirm survival-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorTechnological regimes-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorActive learning-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorEntry size and timing-
dc.subject.keywordPlusRESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT-
dc.subject.keywordPlusRESOURCE-BASED VIEW-
dc.subject.keywordPlusMARKET-STRUCTURE-
dc.subject.keywordPlusSCHUMPETERIAN PATTERNS-
dc.subject.keywordPlusCOMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE-
dc.subject.keywordPlusDYNAMIC CAPABILITIES-
dc.subject.keywordPlus1ST-MOVER ADVANTAGES-
dc.subject.keywordPlusPRODUCTIVITY GROWTH-
dc.subject.keywordPlusDOMINANT DESIGNS-
dc.subject.keywordPlusLIFE-CYCLE-
Appears in Collection
MT-Journal Papers(저널논문)
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
This item is cited by other documents in WoS
⊙ Detail Information in WoSⓡ Click to see webofscience_button
⊙ Cited 25 items in WoS Click to see citing articles in records_button

qr_code

  • mendeley

    citeulike


rss_1.0 rss_2.0 atom_1.0