Evaluation of thermal efficiency in different types of horizontal ground heat exchangers

Cited 77 time in webofscience Cited 65 time in scopus
  • Hit : 367
  • Download : 0
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorYoon, Seokko
dc.contributor.authorLee, Seung-Raeko
dc.contributor.authorGo, Gyu-Hyunko
dc.date.accessioned2016-04-20T06:21:11Z-
dc.date.available2016-04-20T06:21:11Z-
dc.date.created2015-10-29-
dc.date.created2015-10-29-
dc.date.created2015-10-29-
dc.date.issued2015-10-
dc.identifier.citationENERGY AND BUILDINGS, v.105, pp.100 - 105-
dc.identifier.issn0378-7788-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10203/205276-
dc.description.abstractThe utilization of geothermal energy is constantly increasing for economic and environmental advantages that this brings. Use of horizontal ground-heat exchangers (GHEs) can reduce installation cost and compromise between efficiency and cost. Among many kinds of horizontal GHEs, slinky and spiral-coil-type GHEs show higher thermal efficiency. This paper presents the results of experiments on the heat exchange rates of horizontal slinky, spiral-coil and U-type GHEs installed in a steel box (5 m x 1 m x 1 m). A commercial dry sand was used to fill the steel box, and thermal response tests (TRTs) were conducted for 30 h to evaluate heat-exchange rates according to various GHE-types. The U-type GHE showed the highest heat exchange rate per pipe length, about two and two and half times higher thermal efficiency than that for the horizontal slinky and spiral-coil-type GHEs, respectively. Furthermore, the heat exchange rates per pipe length with a relatively long pitch interval (pitch/diameter = 1) were 100-150% higher than those with a relatively short pitch interval (pitch/diameter = 0.2), in both spiral-coil and horizontal slinky-type GHEs. A cost-efficiency analysis was also performed, and it revealed that the U-type GHE was most economical under conditions of providing equivalent thermal performance.-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.publisherELSEVIER SCIENCE SA-
dc.titleEvaluation of thermal efficiency in different types of horizontal ground heat exchangers-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.wosid000362143200009-
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-84938894086-
dc.type.rimsART-
dc.citation.volume105-
dc.citation.beginningpage100-
dc.citation.endingpage105-
dc.citation.publicationnameENERGY AND BUILDINGS-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.enbuild.2015.07.054-
dc.contributor.localauthorLee, Seung-Rae-
dc.description.isOpenAccessN-
dc.type.journalArticleArticle-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorHorizontal ground-heat exchanger-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorThermal response test-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorHeat exchange rate-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorCost analysis-
dc.subject.keywordPlusFIELD PERFORMANCE-
dc.subject.keywordPlusTRANSFER BEHAVIOR-
dc.subject.keywordPlusRESPONSE TEST-
dc.subject.keywordPlusPUMP SYSTEMS-
dc.subject.keywordPlusENERGY-PILES-
dc.subject.keywordPlusSIMULATION-
dc.subject.keywordPlusSOILS-
Appears in Collection
CE-Journal Papers(저널논문)
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
This item is cited by other documents in WoS
⊙ Detail Information in WoSⓡ Click to see webofscience_button
⊙ Cited 77 items in WoS Click to see citing articles in records_button

qr_code

  • mendeley

    citeulike


rss_1.0 rss_2.0 atom_1.0