Making or breaking climate targets: The AMPERE study on staged accession scenarios for climate policy

Cited 134 time in webofscience Cited 132 time in scopus
  • Hit : 598
  • Download : 0
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKriegler, Elmarko
dc.contributor.authorRiahi, Keywanko
dc.contributor.authorBauer, Nicoko
dc.contributor.authorSchwanitz, Valeria Janako
dc.contributor.authorPetermann, Nilsko
dc.contributor.authorBosetti, Valentinako
dc.contributor.authorMarcucci, Adrianako
dc.contributor.authorOtto, Sanderko
dc.contributor.authorParoussos, Leonidasko
dc.contributor.authorRao, Shilpako
dc.contributor.authorCurras, Tabare Arroyoko
dc.contributor.authorAshina, Shuichiko
dc.contributor.authorBollen, Johannesko
dc.contributor.authorEom, Jiyongko
dc.contributor.authorHamdi-Cherif, Meriemko
dc.contributor.authorLongden, Thomasko
dc.contributor.authorKitous, Albanko
dc.contributor.authorMejean, Aurelieko
dc.contributor.authorSano, Fuminoriko
dc.contributor.authorSchaeffer, Michielko
dc.contributor.authorWada, Kenichiko
dc.contributor.authorCapros, Pantelisko
dc.contributor.authorvan Vuuren, Detlef Pko
dc.contributor.authorEdenhofer, Ottmarko
dc.date.accessioned2015-06-29T04:50:00Z-
dc.date.available2015-06-29T04:50:00Z-
dc.date.created2014-07-13-
dc.date.created2014-07-13-
dc.date.created2014-07-13-
dc.date.created2014-07-13-
dc.date.issued2015-01-
dc.identifier.citationTECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, v.90, no.A, pp.24 - 44-
dc.identifier.issn0040-1625-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10203/199510-
dc.description.abstractThis study explores a situation of staged accession to a global climate policy regime from the current situation of regionally fragmented and moderate climate action. The analysis is based on scenarios in which a front runner coalition – the EU or the EU and China – embarks on immediate ambitious climate action while the rest of the world makes a transition to a global climate regime between 2030 and 2050. We assume that the ensuing regime involves strong mitigation efforts but does not require late joiners to compensate for their initially higher emissions. Thus, climate targets are relaxed, and although staged accession can achieve significant reductions of global warming, the resulting climate outcome is unlikely to be consistent with the goal of limiting global warming to 2 degrees. The addition of China to the front runner coalition can reduce pre-2050 excess emissions by 20–30%, increasing the likelihood of staying below 2 degrees. Not accounting for potential co-benefits, the cost of front runner action is found to be lower for the EU than for China. Regions that delay their accession to the climate regime face a trade-off between reduced short term costs and higher transitional requirements due to larger carbon lock-ins and more rapidly increasing carbon prices during the accession period.-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.publisherELSEVIER SCIENCE INC-
dc.titleMaking or breaking climate targets: The AMPERE study on staged accession scenarios for climate policy-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.wosid000347605300003-
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-84916891763-
dc.type.rimsART-
dc.citation.volume90-
dc.citation.issueA-
dc.citation.beginningpage24-
dc.citation.endingpage44-
dc.citation.publicationnameTECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.techfore.2013.09.021-
dc.contributor.localauthorEom, Jiyong-
dc.contributor.nonIdAuthorKriegler, Elmar-
dc.contributor.nonIdAuthorRiahi, Keywan-
dc.contributor.nonIdAuthorBauer, Nico-
dc.contributor.nonIdAuthorSchwanitz, Valeria Jana-
dc.contributor.nonIdAuthorPetermann, Nils-
dc.contributor.nonIdAuthorBosetti, Valentina-
dc.contributor.nonIdAuthorMarcucci, Adriana-
dc.contributor.nonIdAuthorOtto, Sander-
dc.contributor.nonIdAuthorParoussos, Leonidas-
dc.contributor.nonIdAuthorRao, Shilpa-
dc.contributor.nonIdAuthorCurras, Tabare Arroyo-
dc.contributor.nonIdAuthorAshina, Shuichi-
dc.contributor.nonIdAuthorBollen, Johannes-
dc.contributor.nonIdAuthorHamdi-Cherif, Meriem-
dc.contributor.nonIdAuthorLongden, Thomas-
dc.contributor.nonIdAuthorKitous, Alban-
dc.contributor.nonIdAuthorMejean, Aurelie-
dc.contributor.nonIdAuthorSano, Fuminori-
dc.contributor.nonIdAuthorSchaeffer, Michiel-
dc.contributor.nonIdAuthorWada, Kenichi-
dc.contributor.nonIdAuthorCapros, Pantelis-
dc.contributor.nonIdAuthorvan Vuuren, Detlef P-
dc.contributor.nonIdAuthorEdenhofer, Ottmar-
dc.description.isOpenAccessN-
dc.type.journalArticleArticle-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorClimate change mitigation-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorIntegrated assessment models-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorClimate change economics-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorCarbon leakage-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorEuropean Union-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorRegional climate policies-
dc.subject.keywordPlusCARBON LEAKAGE-
dc.subject.keywordPlusTECHNOLOGICAL-CHANGE-
dc.subject.keywordPlusCHANGE MITIGATION-
dc.subject.keywordPlusMODEL-
dc.subject.keywordPlusEMISSIONS-
dc.subject.keywordPlusMARKETS-
dc.subject.keywordPlusREGIMES-
dc.subject.keywordPlusEXAMPLE-
dc.subject.keywordPlusCHINA-
dc.subject.keywordPlusWORLD-
Appears in Collection
MG-Journal Papers(저널논문)
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
This item is cited by other documents in WoS
⊙ Detail Information in WoSⓡ Click to see webofscience_button
⊙ Cited 134 items in WoS Click to see citing articles in records_button

qr_code

  • mendeley

    citeulike


rss_1.0 rss_2.0 atom_1.0