Passive treatment of acid mine drainage in bioreactors using sulfate-reducing bacteria: Critical review and research needs

Cited 401 time in webofscience Cited 415 time in scopus
  • Hit : 463
  • Download : 2
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorNeculita, Carmen Mihaelako
dc.contributor.authorZagury, GJko
dc.contributor.authorBussiere, Bko
dc.date.accessioned2009-09-02T07:11:24Z-
dc.date.available2009-09-02T07:11:24Z-
dc.date.created2012-02-06-
dc.date.created2012-02-06-
dc.date.issued2007-01-
dc.identifier.citationJOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, v.36, no.1, pp.1 - 16-
dc.identifier.issn0047-2425-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10203/10940-
dc.description.abstractAcid mine drainage (AMD), characterized by low pH and high concentrations of sulfate and heavy metals, is an important and widespread environmental problem related to the mining industry. Sulfate-reducing passive bioreactors have received much attention lately as promising biotechnologies for AMD treatment. They offer advantages such as high metal removal at low pH, stable sludge, very low operation costs, and minimal energy consumption. Sulfide precipitation is the desired mechanism of contaminant removal; however, many mechanisms including adsorption and precipitation of metal carbonates and hydroxides occur in passive bioreactors. The efficiency of sulfate-reducing passive bioreactors is sometimes limited because they rely on the activity of an anaerobic microflora [including sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB)] which is controlled primarily by the reactive mixture composition. The most important mixture component is the organic carbon source. The performance of field bioreactors can also be limited by AMD load and metal toxicity. Several studies conducted to find the best mixture of natural organic substrates for SRB are reviewed. Moreover, critical parameters for design and long-term operation are discussed. Additional work needs to be done to properly assess the long-term efficiency of reactive mixtures and the metal removal mechanisms. Furthermore, metal speciation and ecotoxicological assessment of treated effluent from on-site passive bioreactors have yet to be performed.-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.language.isoen_USen
dc.publisherAMER SOC AGRONOMY-
dc.subjectPERMEABLE REACTIVE BARRIERS-
dc.subjectFLUIDIZED-BED REACTOR-
dc.subjectDESULFOVIBRIO-DESULFURICANS G20-
dc.subjectCONTAINING WASTE-WATER-
dc.subjectMETAL REMOVAL-
dc.subjectCONSTRUCTED WETLAND-
dc.subjectCOLUMN EXPERIMENTS-
dc.subjectHEAVY-METALS-
dc.subjectMICROBIOLOGICAL TREATMENT-
dc.subjectSULFIDE PRECIPITATION-
dc.titlePassive treatment of acid mine drainage in bioreactors using sulfate-reducing bacteria: Critical review and research needs-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.wosid000243575400001-
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-33846207502-
dc.type.rimsART-
dc.citation.volume36-
dc.citation.issue1-
dc.citation.beginningpage1-
dc.citation.endingpage16-
dc.citation.publicationnameJOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY-
dc.identifier.doi10.2134/jeq2006.0066-
dc.embargo.liftdate9999-12-31-
dc.embargo.terms9999-12-31-
dc.contributor.localauthorNeculita, Carmen Mihaela-
dc.contributor.nonIdAuthorZagury, GJ-
dc.contributor.nonIdAuthorBussiere, B-
dc.type.journalArticleReview-
dc.subject.keywordPlusPERMEABLE REACTIVE BARRIERS-
dc.subject.keywordPlusFLUIDIZED-BED REACTOR-
dc.subject.keywordPlusDESULFOVIBRIO-DESULFURICANS G20-
dc.subject.keywordPlusCONTAINING WASTE-WATER-
dc.subject.keywordPlusMETAL REMOVAL-
dc.subject.keywordPlusCONSTRUCTED WETLAND-
dc.subject.keywordPlusCOLUMN EXPERIMENTS-
dc.subject.keywordPlusHEAVY-METALS-
dc.subject.keywordPlusMICROBIOLOGICAL TREATMENT-
dc.subject.keywordPlusSULFIDE PRECIPITATION-
Appears in Collection
CE-Journal Papers(저널논문)
Files in This Item
This item is cited by other documents in WoS
⊙ Detail Information in WoSⓡ Click to see webofscience_button
⊙ Cited 401 items in WoS Click to see citing articles in records_button

qr_code

  • mendeley

    citeulike


rss_1.0 rss_2.0 atom_1.0