Identifying helpful reviews based on customer's mentions about experiences

Cited 31 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
  • Hit : 843
  • Download : 0
As numerous on-line product reviews that vary in quality are published every day, much attention is being paid to quality assessment of such reviews. The current metric of using the number of votes by other customers such as 'helpful vote', despite its dominance, does not yield a fully effective outcome. In this article, we propose a novel metric to rank product reviews by 'mentions about experiences', accounting for customer's personal experiences, as a way of identifying high quality reviews. The proposed metric has two parameters that capture time expressions related to the use of products and product entities over different purchasing time periods by linguistic clues. The empirical results show that this metric is not only as helpful as the best existing metrics, 'helpful vote' or 'reviewer rank', but is also free from undesirable biases that either penalize recency or are driven solely by popularity. Our usability study also shows that ordering reviews by our metric is considered helpful on the accounts of both usefulness and satisfaction. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Publisher
PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
Issue Date
2012-11
Language
English
Article Type
Article
Citation

EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, v.39, no.15, pp.11830 - 11838

ISSN
0957-4174
DOI
10.1016/j.eswa.2012.01.116
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/10203/102715
Appears in Collection
CS-Journal Papers(저널논문)
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
This item is cited by other documents in WoS
⊙ Detail Information in WoSⓡ Click to see webofscience_button
⊙ Cited 31 items in WoS Click to see citing articles in records_button

qr_code

  • mendeley

    citeulike


rss_1.0 rss_2.0 atom_1.0