Interpretation of coal gasification modeling in commercial process analysis simulation codes

Cited 2 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
  • Hit : 340
  • Download : 0
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLee, Hookyungko
dc.contributor.authorChoi, Sangminko
dc.contributor.authorPaek, Minsuko
dc.date.accessioned2013-03-11T21:35:02Z-
dc.date.available2013-03-11T21:35:02Z-
dc.date.created2012-02-06-
dc.date.created2012-02-06-
dc.date.issued2010-07-
dc.identifier.citationJOURNAL OF MECHANICAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, v.24, no.7, pp.1515 - 1521-
dc.identifier.issn1738-494X-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10203/100370-
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this study is to recognize modeling methods for coal combustion and gasification in commercial process analysis codes. Many users have appreciated the reliability of commercial process analysis simulation codes; however, it is necessary to understand the physical meaning and limitations of the modeling results. Modeling of coal gasification phenomena has been embodied in commercial process analysis simulators such as Aspen. Commercial code deals with modeling of the gasification system with a number of reactor blocks supported by the specific code, not as a coal gasifier. However, the primary purpose of using process analysis simulation code is to interpret the whole plant cycle rather than an individual unit such as a gasifier. Equilibrium models of a coal gasifier are generally adopted in the commercial codes, where the method of Gibbs free energy minimization of chemical species is applied at the given temperature and pressure. The equilibrium model of the coal gasifier, RGibbs, in commercial codes provides users with helpful information, such as exit syngas temperature, composition, flow rate, performance of coal gasifier model, etc. with various input and operating conditions. This simulation code is being used to generate simple and fast response of results. Limitations and uncertainties are interpreted in the view of the gasification process, chemical reaction, char reactivity, and reactor geometry. In addition, case studies are introduced with examples. Finally, a way to improve the coal gasifier model is indicated, and a kinetically modified model considering reaction rate is proposed.-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.publisherKOREAN SOC MECHANICAL ENGINEERS-
dc.subjectCOMBINED-CYCLE-
dc.subjectASPEN PLUS-
dc.subjectGASIFIER-
dc.subjectPERFORMANCE-
dc.titleInterpretation of coal gasification modeling in commercial process analysis simulation codes-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.wosid000280070100017-
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-77954724458-
dc.type.rimsART-
dc.citation.volume24-
dc.citation.issue7-
dc.citation.beginningpage1515-
dc.citation.endingpage1521-
dc.citation.publicationnameJOURNAL OF MECHANICAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY-
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s12206-010-0411-7-
dc.contributor.localauthorChoi, Sangmin-
dc.contributor.nonIdAuthorPaek, Minsu-
dc.type.journalArticleArticle-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorCoal gasification-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorModeling-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorProcess analysis-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorCommercial code-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorEquilibrium-
dc.subject.keywordPlusCOMBINED-CYCLE-
dc.subject.keywordPlusASPEN PLUS-
dc.subject.keywordPlusGASIFIER-
dc.subject.keywordPlusPERFORMANCE-
Appears in Collection
ME-Journal Papers(저널논문)
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
This item is cited by other documents in WoS
⊙ Detail Information in WoSⓡ Click to see webofscience_button
⊙ Cited 2 items in WoS Click to see citing articles in records_button

qr_code

  • mendeley

    citeulike


rss_1.0 rss_2.0 atom_1.0