How to assess the capacity of urban airspace: A topological approach using keep-in and keep-out geofence

Cited 36 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
  • Hit : 590
  • Download : 0
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCho, Jungwooko
dc.contributor.authorYoon, Yoonjinko
dc.date.accessioned2018-08-20T07:49:12Z-
dc.date.available2018-08-20T07:49:12Z-
dc.date.created2018-08-01-
dc.date.created2018-08-01-
dc.date.issued2018-07-
dc.identifier.citationTRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART C-EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES, v.92, pp.137 - 149-
dc.identifier.issn0968-090X-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10203/244855-
dc.description.abstractThe anticipated proliferation of small Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (sUAVs) in urban areas has garnered greater interest in capacity estimation of the low-altitude airspace. As a first step to assess such capacity, we propose a topological analysis framework to identify free versus usable airspace in a 3D environment filled with abundant geometric elements. To incorporate the underlying geospatial complexity as well as vehicle operational requirements, two types of geofence (-) keep-out and keep-in (-) are utilized. The keep-out geofence defines a boundary around static objects to keep sUAV out. The keep-in geofence is a 3-D sphere to keep a vehicle in. While the keep-out mainly focuses on public assurance as a mitigation measure against collision and privacy risk, the keep-in mainly concerns the operational feasibility of a vehicle. Three scenarios of keep-out, keep-in, and dual geofencing were applied and compared in a hypothetical case study as well as in the real 3-D environment of Seoul, South Korea. The results show that the keep-in usability is an upperbound of the keep-out, due to its unique capability to identify corridor segments using the alpha shape method. The dual scenario demonstrated tradeoffs between two types of geofence in a built-up environment, in which the keep-in exhibited more robust behavior than the keep-out. It is evident that both geofencing methods need to be considered in parallel in urban areas. In addition, decisions on the geofence parameters should be made in accordance with the geospatial complexity and flight purposes, rather than relying on fixed values. The proposed framework is not only capable of evaluating airspace availability in an adaptive and intelligent manner, but also has the potentials to identify departure/arrival locations and design ascent/descent routes.-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.publisherPERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD-
dc.titleHow to assess the capacity of urban airspace: A topological approach using keep-in and keep-out geofence-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.wosid000438480900009-
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85046637232-
dc.type.rimsART-
dc.citation.volume92-
dc.citation.beginningpage137-
dc.citation.endingpage149-
dc.citation.publicationnameTRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART C-EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.trc.2018.05.001-
dc.contributor.localauthorYoon, Yoonjin-
dc.description.isOpenAccessN-
dc.type.journalArticleArticle-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorUrban airspace design-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorAirspace capacity-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorGeofence-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorAlpha shape method-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorUTM-
Appears in Collection
CE-Journal Papers(저널논문)
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
This item is cited by other documents in WoS
⊙ Detail Information in WoSⓡ Click to see webofscience_button
⊙ Cited 36 items in WoS Click to see citing articles in records_button

qr_code

  • mendeley

    citeulike


rss_1.0 rss_2.0 atom_1.0