Efficiency and effectiveness between open and closed innovation: empirical evidence in South Korean manufacturers

Cited 52 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
  • Hit : 2115
  • Download : 0
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBae, Youngimko
dc.contributor.authorChang, Hyunjoonko
dc.date.accessioned2013-03-12T17:54:52Z-
dc.date.available2013-03-12T17:54:52Z-
dc.date.created2013-01-07-
dc.date.created2013-01-07-
dc.date.issued2012-
dc.identifier.citationTECHNOLOGY ANALYSIS & STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT, v.24, no.10, pp.967 - 980-
dc.identifier.issn0953-7325-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10203/103073-
dc.description.abstractThis study addresses two main questions. First, what is the best measurement of innovation performance? Second, is there a significant difference in the performance between open and closed innovation firms? We discuss new measures ('efficiency' and 'effectiveness') and investigate any differences between open innovation and closed innovation firms by using indicators. The impact of open innovation on firm performance has been examined in existing studies. Most papers, however, employ simple indicators such as patents and financial data. This paper verifies the relationship between open innovation and performance in the Korean manufacturing industry using a new approach. The results show that both efficiency and effectiveness were statistically higher among open innovation firms than among their closed counterparts. It may thus be concluded that the acquisition of outside technology or knowledge has a positive impact on firm performance.-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.publisherROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD-
dc.subjectKNOWLEDGE SOURCES-
dc.subjectEXPERT JUDGMENTS-
dc.subjectPERFORMANCE-
dc.subjectINDUSTRY-
dc.subjectNETWORKS-
dc.subjectFIRMS-
dc.subjectDETERMINANTS-
dc.subjectCOOPERATION-
dc.subjectALLIANCES-
dc.subjectNOVELTY-
dc.titleEfficiency and effectiveness between open and closed innovation: empirical evidence in South Korean manufacturers-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.wosid000310057300001-
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-84867524543-
dc.type.rimsART-
dc.citation.volume24-
dc.citation.issue10-
dc.citation.beginningpage967-
dc.citation.endingpage980-
dc.citation.publicationnameTECHNOLOGY ANALYSIS & STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT-
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/09537325.2012.724164-
dc.contributor.nonIdAuthorBae, Youngim-
dc.type.journalArticleArticle-
dc.subject.keywordAuthoropen innovation-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorefficiency-
dc.subject.keywordAuthoreffectiveness-
dc.subject.keywordAuthordata envelopment analysis-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorfuzzy set theory-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorKorea Innovation Survey-
dc.subject.keywordPlusKNOWLEDGE SOURCES-
dc.subject.keywordPlusEXPERT JUDGMENTS-
dc.subject.keywordPlusPERFORMANCE-
dc.subject.keywordPlusINDUSTRY-
dc.subject.keywordPlusNETWORKS-
dc.subject.keywordPlusFIRMS-
dc.subject.keywordPlusDETERMINANTS-
dc.subject.keywordPlusCOOPERATION-
dc.subject.keywordPlusALLIANCES-
dc.subject.keywordPlusNOVELTY-
Appears in Collection
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
This item is cited by other documents in WoS
⊙ Detail Information in WoSⓡ Click to see webofscience_button
⊙ Cited 52 items in WoS Click to see citing articles in records_button

qr_code

  • mendeley

    citeulike


rss_1.0 rss_2.0 atom_1.0