Normalization of Cortical Thickness Measurements across Different T1 Magnetic Resonance Imaging Protocols by Novel W-Score Standardization

Cited 16 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
  • Hit : 572
  • Download : 0
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorChung, Jinyongko
dc.contributor.authorYoo, Kwangsunko
dc.contributor.authorLee, Peterko
dc.contributor.authorKim, Chan Miko
dc.contributor.authorRoh, Jee Hoonko
dc.contributor.authorPark, Ji Eunko
dc.contributor.authorKim, Sang Joonko
dc.contributor.authorSeo, Sang Wonko
dc.contributor.authorShin, Jeong-Hyeonko
dc.contributor.authorSeong, Joon-Kyungko
dc.contributor.authorJeong, Yongko
dc.date.accessioned2017-11-20T08:26:35Z-
dc.date.available2017-11-20T08:26:35Z-
dc.date.created2017-07-26-
dc.date.created2017-07-26-
dc.date.issued2017-07-
dc.identifier.citationNEUROIMAGE, v.159, pp.224 - 235-
dc.identifier.issn1053-8119-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10203/227081-
dc.description.abstractBackground: The use of different 3D T1-weighted magnetic resonance (T1 MR) imaging protocols induces image incompatibility across multicenter studies, negating the many advantages of multicenter studies. A few methods have been developed to address this problem, but significant image incompatibility still remains. Thus, we developed a novel and convenient method to improve image compatibility. Methods: W-score standardization creates quality reference values by using a healthy group to obtain normalized disease values. We developed a protocol-specific w-score standardization to control the protocol effect, which is applied to each protocol separately. We used three data sets. In dataset 1, brain T1 MR images of normal controls (NC) and patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD) from two centers, acquired with different T1 MR protocols, were used (Protocol 1 and 2, n = 45/group). In dataset 2, data from six subjects, who underwent MRI with two different protocols (Protocol 1 and 2), were used with different repetition times, echo times, and slice thicknesses. In dataset 3, T1 MR images from a large number of healthy normal controls (Protocol 1: n = 148, Protocol 2: n = 343) were collected for w-score standardization. The protocol effect and disease effect on subjects' cortical thickness were analyzed before and after the application of protocol-specific w-score standardization. Results: As expected, different protocols resulted in differing cortical thickness measurements in both NC and AD subjects. Different measurements were obtained for the same subject when imaged with different protocols. Multivariate pattern difference between measurements was observed between the protocols. Classification accuracy between two protocols was nearly 90%. After applying protocol-specific w-score standardization, the differences between the protocols substantially decreased. Most importantly, protocol-specific w-score standardization reduced both univariate and multivariate differences in the images while maintaining the AD disease effect. Compared to conventional regression methods, our method showed the best performance for in terms of controlling the protocol effect while preserving disease information. Conclusions: Protocol-specific w-score standardization effectively resolved the concerns of conventional regression methods. It showed the best performance for improving the compatibility of a T1 MR post-processed feature, cortical thickness.-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.publisherACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE-
dc.subjectMILD COGNITIVE IMPAIRMENT-
dc.subjectSUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE-
dc.subjectALZHEIMERS-DISEASE-
dc.subjectTEXTURE ANALYSIS-
dc.subjectFIELD-STRENGTH-
dc.subjectFMRI DATA-
dc.subjectMRI DATA-
dc.subjectBRAIN-
dc.subjectMULTICENTER-
dc.subjectIMAGES-
dc.titleNormalization of Cortical Thickness Measurements across Different T1 Magnetic Resonance Imaging Protocols by Novel W-Score Standardization-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.wosid000414073100020-
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85026680101-
dc.type.rimsART-
dc.citation.volume159-
dc.citation.beginningpage224-
dc.citation.endingpage235-
dc.citation.publicationnameNEUROIMAGE-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.07.053-
dc.contributor.localauthorJeong, Yong-
dc.contributor.nonIdAuthorKim, Chan Mi-
dc.contributor.nonIdAuthorRoh, Jee Hoon-
dc.contributor.nonIdAuthorPark, Ji Eun-
dc.contributor.nonIdAuthorKim, Sang Joon-
dc.contributor.nonIdAuthorSeo, Sang Won-
dc.contributor.nonIdAuthorShin, Jeong-Hyeon-
dc.contributor.nonIdAuthorSeong, Joon-Kyung-
dc.description.isOpenAccessN-
dc.type.journalArticleArticle-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorT1 MR imaging-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorCortical thickness-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorImage compatibility-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorW-score standardization-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorAlzheimer&apos-
dc.subject.keywordAuthors disease-
dc.subject.keywordPlusMILD COGNITIVE IMPAIRMENT-
dc.subject.keywordPlusSUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE-
dc.subject.keywordPlusALZHEIMERS-DISEASE-
dc.subject.keywordPlusTEXTURE ANALYSIS-
dc.subject.keywordPlusFIELD-STRENGTH-
dc.subject.keywordPlusFMRI DATA-
dc.subject.keywordPlusMRI DATA-
dc.subject.keywordPlusBRAIN-
dc.subject.keywordPlusMULTICENTER-
dc.subject.keywordPlusIMAGES-
Appears in Collection
BiS-Journal Papers(저널논문)
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
This item is cited by other documents in WoS
⊙ Detail Information in WoSⓡ Click to see webofscience_button
⊙ Cited 16 items in WoS Click to see citing articles in records_button

qr_code

  • mendeley

    citeulike


rss_1.0 rss_2.0 atom_1.0